Writing & creativity benchmarks
Explore writing, storytelling, and artistic tasks. Results reflect each evaluation's criteria for creativity, style, coherence, or quality rather than a single universal measure of creative ability.
Published
Updated:
Models tested: 126
Writing video scripts against a fixed reference style, with separate rubric scores, model-judge preferences and evaluation settings.
Top models · tonebench
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1GPT-6 SolMedium81.06 source score
- 2GPT-6 SolMax80.55 source score
- 3GPT-6 AstraMax80.37 source score
Updated:
Models tested: 144
Author workflows covering creative writing, editing, translation, instruction following and factual reliability in Novelcrafter’s published evaluation suite.
Top models · nc bench
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Claude Opus 5.5Thinking96.43%
- 2GPT-6.1 SolMedium95.88%
- 3Gemini 3.8 FlashMedium95.72%
Updated:
Models tested: 90
Short-form creative writing evaluated by LLM judges using pairwise Elo comparisons and writing-quality rubrics. Reported scores are preserved before optional interactive…
Top models · eq bench
Latest result per model · creative-writing-v3
- 1Grok 4.717.16 rubric score
- 2Claude Opus 517.07 rubric score
- 3GLM 5.317.04 rubric score
Updated:
Models tested: 50
Models write short stories to the same constrained creative briefs. Independent evaluators make pairwise comparisons of matched stories in both orders. The current pooled-panel…
Top models · lechmazur short story
Latest result per model · 8ba548d1cffefa5c472d3832e05f64e119a88fa4
- 1Claude Fable 5.1High3.76
- 2Claude Opus 5Extra high3.73
- 3Claude Opus 5.5High3.71
Updated:
Models tested: 93
Planning, revising and writing an eight-part story from a short prompt. LLM judges assess chapter quality and the completed narrative; the published overall score and…
Top models · eq bench
Latest result per model · longform-writing
- 1Claude Opus 5.517.53 rubric score
- 2Claude Opus 517.51 rubric score
- 3Claude Fable 5.117.48 rubric score
Updated:
Models tested: 16
Writing long-form video scripts for twelve test prompts, assessed by blind model judges on hook, retention, storytelling, voice, pacing and clarity; reported cost is relative to a…
Top models · tubelab
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Claude Fable 59.4 score out of 10
- 2Claude Opus 59.4 score out of 10
- 3Claude Opus 4.89.3 score out of 10
Updated:
Models tested: 191
Human pairwise preferences over SVG illustrations generated from the same prompts, reported on the publisher’s rating scale.
Top models · svgbench
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1GPT-5.4 Pro2,058
- 2MiMo-V2.51,865
- 3Claude Opus 4.71,802
Updated:
Models tested: 18
LLM-judged creative writing quality on the legacy v2 rubric. Original published scores are retained without the page’s optional vocabulary-complexity or repetitive-language slider…
Top models · eq bench
Latest result per model · creative-writing-v2
- 1DeepSeek R187.11%
- 2Gemma 3 27B85.25%
- 3GPT-4o (2024-11-20)84.59%
Updated:
Models tested: 16
Repetitive writing patterns measured from stock words, trigrams and contrast constructions. The official composite weights normalized frequencies by 60%, 15% and 25%; lower scores…
Top models · eq bench
Latest result per model · slop-score
- 1O30.09 matches per 1000 chars
- 2GPT-5 Mini0.13 matches per 1000 chars
- 3Llama 4 Maverick0.13 matches per 1000 chars
Updated:
Models tested: 15
Humour analysis evaluated by EQ-Bench, measuring how well language models identify and explain comedic material. The published score and confidence interval are kept independently…
Top models · eq bench
Latest result per model · buzzbench
- 1Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-0671.09%
- 2GPT-4.167.1%
- 3DeepSeek R162.73%
Updated:
Models tested: 151
Human pairwise preferences on creative writing prompts in Arena’s text evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings…
Top models · Arena
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Claude Opus 5.5High1,534.57
- 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,527.25
- 3Claude Fable 5.1Max1,508.78
Updated:
Models tested: 151
Human pairwise preferences on industry entertainment and sports and media prompts in Arena’s text evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these…
Top models · Arena
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,526.74
- 2Claude Opus 5.5High1,514.87
- 3Claude Fable 5.1Max1,496.79
Updated:
Models tested: 151
Human pairwise preferences on industry writing and literature and language prompts in Arena’s text evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty;…
Top models · Arena
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Claude Opus 5.5High1,531.8
- 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,529.39
- 3Claude Fable 5.1Max1,510.5
Updated:
Models tested: 151
Human pairwise preferences on creative writing prompts in Arena’s text style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for…
Top models · Arena
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Claude Opus 5.5High1,519.69
- 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,515.76
- 3Claude Fable 5High1,500.85
Updated:
Models tested: 151
Human pairwise preferences on industry entertainment and sports and media prompts in Arena’s text style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and…
Top models · Arena
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,518.57
- 2Claude Opus 5.5High1,502.1
- 3Claude Fable 5High1,492.8
Updated:
Models tested: 151
Human pairwise preferences on industry writing and literature and language prompts in Arena’s text style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and…
Top models · Arena
Latest result per model · Version not reported
- 1Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,520.31
- 2Claude Opus 5.5High1,519.28
- 3Claude Fable 5High1,507.84
Methodology and provenance
Benchize collects and structures public benchmark reports. Scores, costs, timings, ranks and uncertainty remain attributed to their original sources. Different versions, configurations and measurement units are separate results. Missing fields stay unavailable.