Multimodal benchmarks

Evaluate models working with images, audio, video, and mixed inputs. Tasks range from recognizing content to reasoning over charts, documents, and other visual or audiovisual evidence.

Published

Updated:

Models tested: 37

Human pairwise evaluation of svg outputs, measuring preference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with 95%…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Gemini 4 Argon1,753.02 elo
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.51,598.61 elo
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol1,577.42 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 37

Human pairwise evaluation of svg outputs, measuring alignment. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with 95%…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Gemini 4 Argon1,665.63 elo
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.51,532.66 elo
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.51,516.39 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 37

Human pairwise evaluation of svg outputs, measuring coherence. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with 95%…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1GPT-6 Astra1,374.31 elo
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol1,292.44 elo
  3. 3Claude Fable 5.11,206.97 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 37

Human pairwise evaluation of svg outputs, measuring overall preference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1GPT-6.1 Sol1,440.73 elo
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.51,398.47 elo
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.51,385.89 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 82

Human pairwise preferences on the complete prompt population in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,324.88
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5High1,320.82
  3. 3Claude Opus 5High1,319.62
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 82

Human pairwise preferences on the complete prompt population in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,308.71
  2. 2Qwen3.8 Max1,300
  3. 3Claude Opus 4.6High1,299.07
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 24

Humans perceive far more in a scene than what is explicitly depicted: a single glance captures past causes and future trajectories; a quick peek determines if a vehicle can fit…

Top models · scale

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 4 ArgonHigh55.4 source score
  2. 2GPT-6 AstraMax53.6 source score
  3. 3GPT-6.1 SolMax46.6 source score
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 21

Detecting assembly mistakes from photographs of three IKEA furniture builds and their official assembly manuals. Models judge whether the build is correct and identify and explain…

Top models · epoch ai

Latest result per model · Furniture Assembly

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max83.33%
  2. 2GPT-6 AstraMax80%
  3. 3GPT-6.1 SolMax80%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max83.02%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5.1Max79.25%
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5Max73.59%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max52.63%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5.1Max44.36%
  3. 3Gemini 4 ArgonHigh43.61%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max90.91%
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5Max81.82%
  3. 3Claude Fable 5.1Max81.82%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max50%
  2. 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh47.22%
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5Max44.44%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max55%
  2. 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh45%
  3. 3Muse WonderMax35%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max64.1%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5.1Max56.41%
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5Max51.28%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max72.22%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5.1Max64.82%
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5Max50%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max92.21%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5.1Max87.01%
  3. 3GPT-6.1 SolMax84.42%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max70.21%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5.1Max61.25%
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5Max58.33%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max92.31%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5.1Max76.92%
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5Max76.92%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Max89.47%
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5Max73.68%
  3. 3Claude Fable 5.1Max71.05%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 14

Resolving GitHub issues in JavaScript front-end repositories where the report is a screenshot as much as a description

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Sonnet 5.5Max50%
  2. 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh50%
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5Max50%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 29

Multimodal understanding on MMMU-Pro without Python augmentation.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1Claude Fable 5.1Max90.64%
  2. 2Claude Opus 5Max89.88%
  3. 3Claude Fable 5Max89.31%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 9

Human pairwise evaluation of llm-to-3d outputs, measuring preference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 4 Argon1,794.09 elo
  2. 2GPT-6 Astra1,690.55 elo
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol1,552.64 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 9

Human pairwise evaluation of llm-to-3d outputs, measuring alignment. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with 95%…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1GPT-6 Astra1,601.59 elo
  2. 2Gemini 4 Argon1,576.04 elo
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol1,500.92 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 9

Human pairwise evaluation of llm-to-3d outputs, measuring coherence. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with 95%…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1GPT-6 Astra1,619.89 elo
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol1,499.65 elo
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.51,388.76 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 9

Human pairwise evaluation of llm-to-3d outputs, measuring creativity. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 4 Argon1,841.61 elo
  2. 2GPT-6 Astra1,380.48 elo
  3. 3Gemini 3.8 Flash1,330.58 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 9

Human pairwise evaluation of llm-to-3d outputs, measuring overall preference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 4 Argon1,605.59 elo
  2. 2GPT-6 Astra1,563.27 elo
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol1,458.56 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 23

Human pairwise preference evaluation of image generation. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are retained…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,408 elo
  2. 2GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,385 elo
  3. 3GPT Image 21,365 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1Claude Opus 574.94%
  2. 2Muse Spark 1.1Extra high73.08%
  3. 3Muse Spark 1.272.73%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1Muse Spark 1.259.42%
  2. 2Gemini 3.5 FlashHigh58.1%
  3. 3Muse Spark 1.1Extra high57.11%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1Claude Opus 572.06%
  2. 2Claude Opus 4.7Max70.27%
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5Max70.03%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max74.15%
  2. 2Claude Opus 573.9%
  3. 3GPT-5.6 SolMax72.64%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1Claude Opus 4.7Max56.1%
  2. 2Claude Opus 4.8Max54.79%
  3. 3GPT-5.6 SolMax52.56%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1GPT-5.6 Sol99.02%
  2. 2Claude Fable 597.06%
  3. 3Claude Opus 595.1%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1GPT-5.6 SolMax85.77%
  2. 2Claude Opus 5High84.64%
  3. 3Claude Fable 580.52%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 20

Benchmark consisting of a weighted performance across finance, coding, and education tasks. Showing the potential impact that LLM's can have on the economy.

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1.2

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max93.47%
  2. 2Claude Opus 4.8Max89.87%
  3. 3GPT-5.6 SolMax89.34%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 12

Human pairwise evaluation of text-to-image outputs, measuring text coherence. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Seedream 4.51,206.23 elo
  2. 2GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,165.94 elo
  3. 3GPT Image 1.5High1,139.47 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 12

Human pairwise evaluation of text-to-image outputs, measuring coherence. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,246.9 elo
  2. 2GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,218.73 elo
  3. 3Nano Banana 2.11,138.41 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 12

Human pairwise evaluation of text-to-image outputs, measuring preference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,233.34 elo
  2. 2GPT Image 1.5High1,224.82 elo
  3. 3GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,178.57 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 12

Human pairwise evaluation of text-to-image outputs, measuring alignment. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,328.73 elo
  2. 2GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,312.13 elo
  3. 3GPT Image 1.5High1,235.96 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 12

Human pairwise evaluation of text-to-image outputs, measuring overall preference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,228.16 elo
  2. 2GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,196.55 elo
  3. 3GPT Image 1.5High1,119.3 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 19

Atomic visual perception across the ten capabilities defined by PerceptionBench.

Top models · perceptionbench

Latest result per model · ba032c06e9b6ee3679171ff6ba643b7a0cfebe2e

  1. 1GPT-5.6 Sol59.7%
  2. 2Kimi K358.5%
  3. 3Claude Fable 557.2%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 4

Human pairwise preference evaluation of audio realism. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are retained for…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1Speech 2 8 Hd1,131 elo
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS1,080 elo
  3. 3S2.1 Pro949 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 9

Human pairwise preference evaluation of image editing. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are retained for…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,404 elo
  2. 2GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,373 elo
  3. 3GPT Image 21,346 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 8

Audio MultiChallenge is a multi-turn benchmark that evaluates conversational intelligence in spoken dialogue systems and audio-language models, including both speech-to-speech and…

Top models · scale

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh60.4 source score
  2. 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh58.41 source score
  3. 3Gemini 2.5 ProThinking46.9 source score
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 6

Audio MultiChallenge is a multi-turn benchmark that evaluates conversational intelligence in spoken dialogue systems and audio-language models, including both speech-to-speech and…

Top models · scale

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh60.4 source score
  2. 2Gemini 4 ArgonHigh58.41 source score
  3. 3Voxtral Small 24B 250726.33 source score
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

Fine-grained visual perception and reasoning with Python assistance.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max90.5%
  2. 2GPT-5.6 SolMax88.9%
  3. 3Kimi K3Max85.7%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

Reasoning questions about scientific charts in the CharXiv RQ scope without Python assistance.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max88.9%
  2. 2Kimi K3Max84.8%
  3. 3GPT-5.6 SolMax84.6%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

CharXiv RQ scientific-chart questions with Python assistance.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max93.5%
  2. 2Kimi K3Max91.3%
  3. 3Claude Opus 4.8Max89.9%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

Solving visual mathematics problems without Python assistance.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1GPT-5.6 SolMax95.8%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5Max94.8%
  3. 3Kimi K3Max94.3%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

Solving visual mathematics problems with Python assistance.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max98.6%
  2. 2GPT-5.6 SolMax97.8%
  3. 3Kimi K3Max97.8%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

MMMU-Pro with Python assistance, following the source’s disclosed image-order protocol.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max86.5%
  2. 2GPT-5.6 SolMax84.6%
  3. 3Kimi K3Max83.4%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

Understanding complex document layouts in the OmniDocBench evaluation.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Kimi K3Max91.1%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5Max89.8%
  3. 3GPT-5.5Extra high89.4%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

Visual world-knowledge questions evaluated under the source’s forced-answer protocol.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max56.7%
  2. 2Kimi K3Max51%
  3. 3GPT-5.6 SolMax41.8%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

ZeroBench main-set pass@5 over five runs without Python assistance.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Kimi K3Max23%
  2. 2Claude Fable 5Max23%
  3. 3GPT-5.5Extra high22%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

ZeroBench main-set pass@5 over five runs with Python assistance.

Top models · moonshot k3

Latest result per model · sha256:0e806bbad76dc8e8dbc899a86051e3406bdd5995fe6c6aa1b2176dde4fb28e6c

  1. 1Claude Fable 5Max46%
  2. 2GPT-5.5Extra high41%
  3. 3Kimi K3Max41%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 2

Human pairwise preference evaluation of text to speech. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are retained for…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS1,452 elo
  2. 2Voxtral Mini TTS993 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

VisualToolBench (VTB)is the first benchmark designed to evaluate how well Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can dynamically interact with and reason about visual…

Top models · scale

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Muse Spark 1.144.77 source score
  2. 2Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview28.97 source score
  3. 3Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-0511.75 source score
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 4

Human pairwise evaluation of physics outputs, measuring with-reference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Happyhorse 1 01,076.6 elo
  2. 2Veo 3.1 Fast1,039.59 elo
  3. 3Wan 2.71,008.89 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 4

Human pairwise evaluation of physics outputs, measuring looks-like-reference-pinned. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Happyhorse 1 01,173.32 elo
  2. 2Wan 2.61,081.6 elo
  3. 3Wan 2.71,078.07 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 4

Human pairwise evaluation of physics outputs, measuring with-reference-pinned. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Happyhorse 1 01,118.41 elo
  2. 2Wan 2.61,034.54 elo
  3. 3Veo 3.1 Fast1,009.58 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 4

Human pairwise evaluation of physics outputs, measuring blind. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale with 95%…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Happyhorse 1 01,067.15 elo
  2. 2Veo 3.1 Fast1,035.03 elo
  3. 3Wan 2.7985.89 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 4

Human pairwise evaluation of physics outputs, measuring overall preference. Scores are fitted using the Bradley–Terry preference model and expressed on the publisher’s Elo scale…

Top models · rapidata

Latest result per model · v1

  1. 1Happyhorse 1 01,105.79 elo
  2. 2Wan 2.61,021.95 elo
  3. 3Veo 3.1 Fast1,018.22 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 16

The growing capabilities of multimodal language models have created two critical challenges in their evaluation. First, as these models become more prevalent, their potential…

Top models · scale

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-0554.63 source score
  2. 2Claude Opus 4Thinking46.96 source score
  3. 3Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview46.93 source score
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 7

Human pairwise preference evaluation of video generation. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are retained…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1Seedance 2 01,255 elo
  2. 2Seedance 2.0 Fast1,253 elo
  3. 3Veo 3 1 Lite1,177 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 6

Human pairwise preference evaluation of image to video. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are retained for…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1Seedance 2 01,263 elo
  2. 2Seedance 2.0 Fast1,255 elo
  3. 3Wan 2.71,195 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 5

Human pairwise preference evaluation of multiple images to video. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1Seedance 2 01,306 elo
  2. 2Seedance 2.0 Fast1,304 elo
  3. 3Veo 3.1 Fast1,200 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 3

Human pairwise preference evaluation of multimodal video generation. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1Seedance 2.0 Fast1,335 elo
  2. 2Seedance 2 01,330 elo
  3. 3Wan 2.71,151 elo
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 82

Human pairwise preferences on english prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings rather…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Opus 4.6High1,323.83
  2. 2Claude Fable 5High1,323.15
  3. 3Claude Opus 4.71,321.94
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 82

Human pairwise preferences on english prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for response…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,303.18
  2. 2Claude Opus 4.7High1,302.18
  3. 3Claude Opus 4.71,301.92
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 74

Human pairwise preferences on diagram prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings rather…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,356.7
  2. 2Claude Opus 5High1,347.84
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5High1,344.96
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 74

Human pairwise preferences on ocr prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings rather than…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,336.98
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh1,333.35
  3. 3Claude Opus 5High1,328.85
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 74

Human pairwise preferences on diagram prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for response…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,352.55
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh1,333.26
  3. 3Claude Opus 4.7High1,333.04
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 74

Human pairwise preferences on ocr prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for response style;…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,326.39
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh1,316.02
  3. 3Qwen3.8 Max1,315.92
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 73

Human pairwise preferences on homework prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings rather…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5High1,362.08
  2. 2Claude Fable 5High1,360.87
  3. 3GPT-6.1 SolMax1,355.61
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 73

Human pairwise preferences on homework prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for response…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1GPT-6.1 SolMax1,358.31
  2. 2Claude Fable 5High1,351.86
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5High1,351.49
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 70

Human pairwise preferences on creative writing vision prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3 Pro1,341.57
  2. 2Claude Fable 5High1,337.7
  3. 3Claude Opus 4.6High1,331.3
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 70

Human pairwise preferences on creative writing vision prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3 Pro1,325.45
  2. 2Claude Fable 5High1,318.63
  3. 3GPT-6.1 SolMax1,311.47
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 74

Human pairwise preferences on chinese prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings rather…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh1,416.08
  2. 2Claude Opus 5High1,400.39
  3. 3Gemini 3.7 FlashHigh1,394.11
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 74

Human pairwise preferences on chinese prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for response…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh1,383.73
  2. 2Gemini 3.7 FlashHigh1,368.65
  3. 3Muse Spark 1.3Extra high1,366.49
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 63

Human pairwise preferences on humor prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings rather than…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,340.72
  2. 2Gemini 3 Pro1,338.6
  3. 3Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1,322.39
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 63

Human pairwise preferences on humor prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for response…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Claude Fable 5High1,323.73
  2. 2Gemini 3 Pro1,316.99
  3. 3Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1,299.96
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 34

Human pairwise preferences on entity recognition prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3 Pro1,347.6
  2. 2Gemini 3 Flash1,335.54
  3. 3Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1,329.7
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 34

Human pairwise preferences on entity recognition prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3 Pro1,291.66
  2. 2Gemini 3 Flash1,290.01
  3. 3Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1,283.98
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 22

Human pairwise preferences on captioning prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings rather…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1,344.89
  2. 2Gemini 3 Pro1,325.32
  3. 3Gemini 2.5 Pro1,303.57
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 22

Human pairwise preferences on captioning prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for response…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1,281.62
  2. 2Gemini 3 Pro1,276.59
  3. 3GPT-5.2High1,262.12
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 13

Human pairwise preferences on creative writing prompts in Arena’s vision evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty; these are preference ratings…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3 Pro1,390.64
  2. 2Gemini 3 Flash1,306.36
  3. 3GPT-5.11,291.26
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 13

Human pairwise preferences on creative writing prompts in Arena’s vision style control evaluation. The original organizer publishes model ratings and uncertainty, adjusting for…

Top models · Arena

Latest result per model · Version not reported

  1. 1Gemini 3 Pro1,372.9
  2. 2Gemini 3 Flash1,289.1
  3. 3GPT-5.11,284.6
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 1

Can speech recognition preserve exact structured values in workplace audio?

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1GPT-4o Transcribe88.73%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 1

Can speech recognition preserve exact structured values in workplace audio?

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1GPT-4o Transcribe59.67%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 1

Can speech recognition preserve exact structured values in workplace audio?

Top models · Vals AI

Latest result per model · 1

  1. 1GPT-4o Transcribe4.04%
View details →

Updated:

Models tested: 1

Human pairwise preference evaluation of video editing. Voters compare model outputs for the same request; published Elo ratings and separate model configurations are retained for…

Top models · designarena

Latest result per model · public

  1. 1Wan 2.71,268 elo
View details →

Methodology and provenance

Benchize collects and structures public benchmark reports. Scores, costs, timings, ranks and uncertainty remain attributed to their original sources. Different versions, configurations and measurement units are separate results. Missing fields stay unavailable.